>>507742026
>Bibi wants war because he knows he's totally getting impeached especially if the Israeli university system is fucking gone lol
>
>Oops, a fatal error has occured at some point in the process which is why this whole thing is hanging in limbo right now, someone is making a new plan and thinking about options because the old one must've suddenly gone bad like milk left out in the heat too long

if this doesn't end with netanyahu being investigated and removed I will seek that fom trump!

trump cannot reinforce war-crimes under any circumstances and expect to be the leader of the free world!

at the end of the day, I DONT CARE if these shits destroy eachother! im not taking sides, I DONT FUCKING CARE ABOUT THEM!

THIS IS NOT WHAT I VOTED FOR!

I DID NOT VOTE FOR TRUMP-WMD 2.0!


FUCK TRUMP!

>>507349656

Another Israeli Act of War-Crime

Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war.

UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.

Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.

Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble

>>507673095
>I love having to send every image post four times because I keep getting a connection error.

me too! its fucking media blackout!!! welcome to five-eyes plnitrd NWO!!!

ISRAEL IS AT WAR AND WANTS TO DISRUPT COMMS AND CONTROL INFORMATION DURING REGIME CHANGE ASSASSINATION OPS!!