>>509834600
this one seems closer to the real thing
I remember back in the 90s or so you could sign up as a girl to "modeling classes", which contained some "basics of being attractive" (how to sit, how to walk, etc) plus it would automatically sign you up to "festive events" like being a party entertainer and you'd get invited
like if I'm a very rich person, I want to throw a huge party, I will call up this agency and they'll "get girls" for me
it's not trafficking because the girls actively signed up to go to these gatherings for their own benefits (money and the implicit fame)
it was a quick buck for a young girl, mostly safe and you also got to know many people, which all-in-all was not a bad thing for the way a woman works, specially a young on
some women regretted it becaue it turned out they were not the next-Marylin Monroe, but that's competition for you and there are few written rules for being a "socialite", so more than likely they were hoping for a huge lawsuit in order to draw some money out of it
>pedo
hard-mash X
not.a.single.photo would show "bad touch", too much exposure, suggestive / sexual posing, or anything of the sort
gotta keep it real sometimes