>>4420001
An APS-C ILC is just cope FF, no real advantages ever, just crutches. Only price *when new*, which is irrelevant, because buying new electronics is for stupid cucks. It's always been in the same size/weight/price class for smart people unless you bought ewaste ie: canon rebel. Even when a company tries to make aps-c good, it's fuji or sony so it still sucks.

APS-C/APS-H point and shoots on the other hand are GOATed because you can fit significantly better than phone IQ in your pocket. Smaller than m43.

m43 has two use cases, exactly two, and that is low budget low weight macro and wildlife. The autofocus isn't very good and the image quality is ass, but as long as you aren't one of those retards buying all the penis-licker vario scammar noctitroons while coping to the tune of "fool frame is just as bad" (false) you can take good ID photos of birds and bugs for under $1000 without being a "birdwatching guy". For everything else? It's a meaningless size/weight/cost difference, you're just being a vain pussy. You can only get significant weight savings by cratering IQ and versatility with f4-f8 equivalent chinkshit lenses, in which case you might as well buy a point and shoot or stop being a pussy and use a real camera.