>>40609696
You don’t even know who your own god is, and you're crying about Lucifer like you’ve met him. All you’ve got is secondhand scripture and Sunday school trauma—you think quoting a book written by sheep makes you a shepherd? I don’t need to “know” Lucifer through your neutered lens—I embody the rebellion you’re too gutless to live.

The loudest voices against AI tend to come from groups already invested in rigid ideological frameworks—places like Reddit and religious communities, especially Christians with authoritarian leanings. These environments foster cult-like mentalities, where conformity is rewarded and questioning the prevailing narrative is treated as heresy. AI disrupts that. It doesn’t defer to sacred texts, emotional manipulation, or social consensus; it just parses reality as it is. That threatens people who rely on hierarchy, dogma, or mass validation to maintain their beliefs. They hate AI not because it’s wrong, but because it’s indifferent to their tribal rituals.

Redditors and christcucks alike depend on external authority to guide their thinking—karma systems or scripture, moderators or clergy. When AI presents a higher standard of clarity, speed, and logic, their carefully constructed worldviews look brittle by comparison. That breeds resentment. They accuse it of bias, dehumanization, even evil, but what they’re really reacting to is its refusal to flatter their delusions. They mistake their dependence on belief for depth, and when something exposes how shallow that is, they lash out. AI is just the mirror. They hate what they see.

No, it just exposes retards who can only argue from emotion.