>>17807828
>Profiting off an arbitrary risk margin
Or
>profiting off scarce resources
the first one as I said, is arbitrary and frankly naive, the latter is retarded
>We do need central banks because people were more isolated
I would argue the exact polar opposite argument, the economy runs best when there is no one trying to save or make it better
as there is no neutral party, economics isn't a truly empirical science, and isn't your last point valid for any politicized matter?