Search Results
6/30/2025, 3:00:57 AM
>>714030225
Has anyone pointed out that this is a false equivalence? Unless they are pandering to homosexuals, a jacked guy with his shirt off and thighs exposed is the female equivalent to a girl showing breast and butt for guys. While I don't give a shit if a male dresses like this in media as long as it isn't replacing female sexualization, this shit annoys me. It is like when they have "sexy" things where the females are still in thongs while the guys are fully bottomless. Showing "omg look at this graphic super detailed penis" would be equivalent to showing camel toe or something. Except that women also are not really into seeing super detailed dick so it all in all would be pandering to no one.
Why do these people try to push dicks as being equivalent to even butts so much? Why do they exclusively sexualize men like they are women instead of doing the proper female pandering equivalent?
Has anyone pointed out that this is a false equivalence? Unless they are pandering to homosexuals, a jacked guy with his shirt off and thighs exposed is the female equivalent to a girl showing breast and butt for guys. While I don't give a shit if a male dresses like this in media as long as it isn't replacing female sexualization, this shit annoys me. It is like when they have "sexy" things where the females are still in thongs while the guys are fully bottomless. Showing "omg look at this graphic super detailed penis" would be equivalent to showing camel toe or something. Except that women also are not really into seeing super detailed dick so it all in all would be pandering to no one.
Why do these people try to push dicks as being equivalent to even butts so much? Why do they exclusively sexualize men like they are women instead of doing the proper female pandering equivalent?
Page 1