Why is big freeze prevalent over big crunch? Big freeze turning to nothing would imply a beginning is impossible, contrary to physics, while big crunch makes perfect sense and blackholes expanding and growing and combining are proof. The deceleration will occur just as big freeze says, but blackholes will continue with gravity, and combine and pull in everything slowly. Can someone explain this to me? Eternal reoccurance is the only scientific explanation for existance, and seems in line with the principle an object in motion stays in motion, while big freeze makes 0 sense. Seems like a reddit nihlist fedora take... Doesn't the existence of black holes negate the theory of big freeze already?