Search Results
7/15/2025, 1:08:32 AM
>>715481204
>No, the problem is at the core of communism. All the ideologies derived from communism have the same issues, that indicates that the core is rotten.
That's correct, but they rejected all the "guts" of Marxism, all the specific rules and economic theories that underpin it. There's not talk of a proletariat revolution or labor theory of value. But they took the spirit of Marx with them.
There's a conspiracy of the elite that must be completely overthrown. Only now it's cultural.
The Nietzscheanism is mostly ignored in popular discourse, but it's huge and influential. It's where they get their cultural relativism which isn't true relativism, but rather another tool to attack the west. How do we know the European Ways of Knowing are better than the African Ways of Knowing? Ignore that the Africans got fucking steam rolled and French, British, and others were bringing guns to knife fights for over a century.
>No, the problem is at the core of communism. All the ideologies derived from communism have the same issues, that indicates that the core is rotten.
That's correct, but they rejected all the "guts" of Marxism, all the specific rules and economic theories that underpin it. There's not talk of a proletariat revolution or labor theory of value. But they took the spirit of Marx with them.
There's a conspiracy of the elite that must be completely overthrown. Only now it's cultural.
The Nietzscheanism is mostly ignored in popular discourse, but it's huge and influential. It's where they get their cultural relativism which isn't true relativism, but rather another tool to attack the west. How do we know the European Ways of Knowing are better than the African Ways of Knowing? Ignore that the Africans got fucking steam rolled and French, British, and others were bringing guns to knife fights for over a century.
7/7/2025, 11:09:57 PM
>>17823240
And here we can see two things at play.
1. Foucault is a humanities prof, who conveniently decided that humanity profs are the smartest most informed people in the world who have this secret decoder ring to society no one else has. Isn't this just a tiny bit self-serving and egoistical?
2. He was a homo. He had a beef with commies because they were anti-homo. He just so happens to have a beef with science and psychiatry. I'm pretty sure his entire worldview is just him raging at the world and being very insecure that most institutions dislike homosexuality.
And here we can see two things at play.
1. Foucault is a humanities prof, who conveniently decided that humanity profs are the smartest most informed people in the world who have this secret decoder ring to society no one else has. Isn't this just a tiny bit self-serving and egoistical?
2. He was a homo. He had a beef with commies because they were anti-homo. He just so happens to have a beef with science and psychiatry. I'm pretty sure his entire worldview is just him raging at the world and being very insecure that most institutions dislike homosexuality.
Page 1