the original message of mine clearly states «postpone all conflicts until agi, then relocate». this is a significant condition that ensures the financial, cultural, and political prosperity of collectives adjusted by respectful mass procedures as earthlings moves toward higher material abundance. nonetheless this is not complicated. if all palestinians die from war, it would’ve been better for them if they were relocated invariably of condition, assuming aliveness of biological organism is more desirable than lack therefor, thus a more radical statement remains appropriate. these individuals require a practical solution in a limited timeframe, not self-aggrandizing fantasies. relocation is simple and most probable optimistic outcome maximizing valence with respect to the constraints determined by the multi-centric multi-layered agentic reach from all parties, including horizontal polarities and vertical top-down interventionism. the hypocritical witch hunt of my interlocutors is one of the reasons why serious ethical discussions regarding sensitive or dilemmic subjects are neglected or consensus divergent, and it question the sincerity of their interests in metaethics, if any.

loosely dismissing details based on self-serving motives significantly reduces the truthfulness of interpretation and relevance of subsequent theoretical revisions. as my conversationally-nonsensical interlocutors are projecting the limitations of their own methods, they may fail to understand how «thinking out loud» contrasts narcissistic communication which is principally concerned about reputational value derived from socio-primitive spectators of their messages rather than the message itself, and will «die on the hill» for a mirage that does not even exist as a well-defined position.