Search Results
6/29/2025, 6:05:46 PM
>>529269483
>Humans use something like language.
Your mistake came as early as the first word. Saying "humans," as if to imply you're discussing something that applies to humanity in general when we're actually talking about one specific half of them. There are two types of humans and they use language very differently. If you think it uncommon for a female to say "no" and then become dismayed when her attractive suitor suddenly decides to 'respect her consent' instead of taking the chance to prove himself a worthy mate then I'm sorry to say that you have been brainwashed. For a female, having her first "no" accepted naturally makes her feel unattractive and insecure. But expressing that feeling is taboo in the current cultural zeitgeist. And so it's suppressed until she herself isn't even equipped to understand it anymore. She just feels bad, and she doesn't know why. She turns to pharmaceutical solutions to seek relief for what is actually a sick soul, afflicted not by a chemical imbalance or what-have-you but instead a set of societal rules incompatible with her needs. This would be the inevitable fate of Sonia if Souda was the oh-so-unoffensive consent respecter you think men are supposed to be. In your zeal to defend the princess from the creepy stalker you would damn her to a life of modern misery.
Don't get me wrong, "no means no" is a perfectly valid logical argument. That's part of why it's such effective propaganda. At a glance it sounds crazy to deny something so simple and obvious. I mean, it's literally the same word! But words have different meanings in different contexts. Some things in life are worth pursuing even in the face of rejection, and a woman's heart is one such thing. It's a good general rule to respect the current cultural norms of wherever you find yourself, but not to the extent that you'll give up on a girl that could become the mother of your children and a permanent fixture of your future life, just because she says a two-letter word.
>Humans use something like language.
Your mistake came as early as the first word. Saying "humans," as if to imply you're discussing something that applies to humanity in general when we're actually talking about one specific half of them. There are two types of humans and they use language very differently. If you think it uncommon for a female to say "no" and then become dismayed when her attractive suitor suddenly decides to 'respect her consent' instead of taking the chance to prove himself a worthy mate then I'm sorry to say that you have been brainwashed. For a female, having her first "no" accepted naturally makes her feel unattractive and insecure. But expressing that feeling is taboo in the current cultural zeitgeist. And so it's suppressed until she herself isn't even equipped to understand it anymore. She just feels bad, and she doesn't know why. She turns to pharmaceutical solutions to seek relief for what is actually a sick soul, afflicted not by a chemical imbalance or what-have-you but instead a set of societal rules incompatible with her needs. This would be the inevitable fate of Sonia if Souda was the oh-so-unoffensive consent respecter you think men are supposed to be. In your zeal to defend the princess from the creepy stalker you would damn her to a life of modern misery.
Don't get me wrong, "no means no" is a perfectly valid logical argument. That's part of why it's such effective propaganda. At a glance it sounds crazy to deny something so simple and obvious. I mean, it's literally the same word! But words have different meanings in different contexts. Some things in life are worth pursuing even in the face of rejection, and a woman's heart is one such thing. It's a good general rule to respect the current cultural norms of wherever you find yourself, but not to the extent that you'll give up on a girl that could become the mother of your children and a permanent fixture of your future life, just because she says a two-letter word.
Page 1