Search Results
7/16/2025, 4:21:29 PM
>>81847999
>but you can't even tell me why it makes more sense to believe x than anything else without sounding like a regard.
Laws of logic, morality, and science are immaterial, unchanging, and universal.
A material universe can't produce those things.
They require an eternal, immaterial, personal mind - aka God.
Not just any god qualifies.
The god must be eternal (logic doesn't change), rational (morality isn't arbitrary), and personal (we're moral agents).
>Hinduism has many gods, often contradictory, no grounding for logic.
>Islam's Allah is pure will - not necessarily bound to logic or consistent morality.
>Deism gives you a god who doesn't reveal anything - useless for grounding truth.
Only Christianity says God is eternal, rational, personal, and has revealed Himself clearly.
Without Christianity, you can't justify why logic, morality, or science work at all.
If you argue using logic, you're already borrowing from Christianity.
>but you can't even tell me why it makes more sense to believe x than anything else without sounding like a regard.
Laws of logic, morality, and science are immaterial, unchanging, and universal.
A material universe can't produce those things.
They require an eternal, immaterial, personal mind - aka God.
Not just any god qualifies.
The god must be eternal (logic doesn't change), rational (morality isn't arbitrary), and personal (we're moral agents).
>Hinduism has many gods, often contradictory, no grounding for logic.
>Islam's Allah is pure will - not necessarily bound to logic or consistent morality.
>Deism gives you a god who doesn't reveal anything - useless for grounding truth.
Only Christianity says God is eternal, rational, personal, and has revealed Himself clearly.
Without Christianity, you can't justify why logic, morality, or science work at all.
If you argue using logic, you're already borrowing from Christianity.
Page 1