Search Results
8/5/2025, 3:57:35 PM
>>512274357
KJV and NKJV are decent. However, if you can get an Orthodox Study Bible, they replace the Anti-Christian Masoretic Old Testament with the Septuagint.
If you want a long explanation as to why read here:
https://www.saintjonah.org/articles/translations.htm
My QRD on some other big ones:
NIV is trash. Questionable translation method. Got more pozzed with each new edition.
ESV/NASB are evangelical favorites. NASB might be the better of the two because ESV cuts out Matthew 17:21.
NRSV got pozzed over time.
>>512288442
Douay-Rheims: Trad Caths like it. Other Caths, read NKJV and the Gender-Neutralized NRSV. I like that Douay-Rheims has the Vulgate as its source over the Masoteric text. However the Frenchified translations like Noe instead of Noah take some getting used to.
KJV and NKJV are decent. However, if you can get an Orthodox Study Bible, they replace the Anti-Christian Masoretic Old Testament with the Septuagint.
If you want a long explanation as to why read here:
https://www.saintjonah.org/articles/translations.htm
My QRD on some other big ones:
NIV is trash. Questionable translation method. Got more pozzed with each new edition.
ESV/NASB are evangelical favorites. NASB might be the better of the two because ESV cuts out Matthew 17:21.
NRSV got pozzed over time.
>>512288442
Douay-Rheims: Trad Caths like it. Other Caths, read NKJV and the Gender-Neutralized NRSV. I like that Douay-Rheims has the Vulgate as its source over the Masoteric text. However the Frenchified translations like Noe instead of Noah take some getting used to.
8/5/2025, 3:57:35 PM
>>23057776
KJV and NKJV are decent. However, if you can get an Orthodox Study Bible, they replace the Anti-Christian Masoretic Old Testament with the Septuagint.
If you want a long explanation as to why read here:
https://www.saintjonah.org/articles/translations.htm
My QRD on some other big ones:
NIV is trash. Questionable translation method. Got more pozzed with each new edition.
ESV/NASB are evangelical favorites. NASB might be the better of the two because ESV cuts out Matthew 17:21.
NRSV got pozzed over time.
>>23057858
Douay-Rheims: Trad Caths like it. Other Caths, read NKJV and the Gender-Neutralized NRSV. I like that Douay-Rheims has the Vulgate as its source over the Masoteric text. However the Frenchified translations like Noe instead of Noah take some getting used to.
KJV and NKJV are decent. However, if you can get an Orthodox Study Bible, they replace the Anti-Christian Masoretic Old Testament with the Septuagint.
If you want a long explanation as to why read here:
https://www.saintjonah.org/articles/translations.htm
My QRD on some other big ones:
NIV is trash. Questionable translation method. Got more pozzed with each new edition.
ESV/NASB are evangelical favorites. NASB might be the better of the two because ESV cuts out Matthew 17:21.
NRSV got pozzed over time.
>>23057858
Douay-Rheims: Trad Caths like it. Other Caths, read NKJV and the Gender-Neutralized NRSV. I like that Douay-Rheims has the Vulgate as its source over the Masoteric text. However the Frenchified translations like Noe instead of Noah take some getting used to.
Page 1