>>96013621
>Do you really need to deliver an essay on why Sir Bearington "doesn't make sense", though?
If you don't understand how RPGs work? Yes, it's good to have an explanation. Part of why Bearington had success on Reddit rather than here is because on /tg/, most people understood how RPGs, particularly D&D, worked, and the story not making a whole lot of sense stood out.

On Reddit, it found an audience of "RPG-curious" and even "RPG-oblivious" people, kinda like how AI images of cakes get liked on facebook by people who don't know anything about either baking or AI images. On Reddit, you have people who said things like "That sounds amazing! I can't wait to play DaD and also play a Bearington!", just like you have fifty-year-old wine aunts commenting "That cake looks delicious! Can I get the recipe?"

People shouldn't need explanations why bad stories are bad, but some people are particularly dumb.