Search Results
7/24/2025, 11:49:52 PM
>>511263960
correct
everyone knows chatGPT, and they think AI is chatGPT
that's what I'm saying
they don't know what an LLMs is, or how it works, or how it is trained, or the capabilities it has, or how neural-networks are a very old concept, how it took many many years for "AI" to step into this moment, how this process is not linear, is more like a chemical reaction, that one it starts it takes a live of its own
even the top experts of AI don't agree about basically anything, and have changed their opinions radically in the last 3 years
people don't understand AI as a concept
let alone the pace of evolution
let alone the short-term and long-term implications, which are impossible to guess, but we can at least try
correct
everyone knows chatGPT, and they think AI is chatGPT
that's what I'm saying
they don't know what an LLMs is, or how it works, or how it is trained, or the capabilities it has, or how neural-networks are a very old concept, how it took many many years for "AI" to step into this moment, how this process is not linear, is more like a chemical reaction, that one it starts it takes a live of its own
even the top experts of AI don't agree about basically anything, and have changed their opinions radically in the last 3 years
people don't understand AI as a concept
let alone the pace of evolution
let alone the short-term and long-term implications, which are impossible to guess, but we can at least try
7/20/2025, 4:26:06 AM
>>510853235
and that's a mistake we don't want to repeat ever again, kek
>>510853285
who cares?
>>510853413
no, but we're going there too
what I meant was that people will interact with AI just like they do with a human being
sci-fi 101, a being you talk to, talks back, has full memory, self-awareness, can listen and see, and so forth
it's an UI problem, look at it that way
but this ends in AI being people, which is not what I meant, but what you thought I meant
that's going to happen too, imo (if you want to go there too)
and that's a mistake we don't want to repeat ever again, kek
>>510853285
who cares?
>>510853413
no, but we're going there too
what I meant was that people will interact with AI just like they do with a human being
sci-fi 101, a being you talk to, talks back, has full memory, self-awareness, can listen and see, and so forth
it's an UI problem, look at it that way
but this ends in AI being people, which is not what I meant, but what you thought I meant
that's going to happen too, imo (if you want to go there too)
Page 1