Search Results
7/26/2025, 7:31:44 PM
>511433479
If russians rape men weaker than them and those they want to punish, your forefathers that failed their uprising, that had funding from abroad by the way, would naturally be raped. They failed despite everything, making them weaker and an uprising would be something the russians would want to punish. Also, as stated by wikipedia, a source you love to use, the first cases of HIV likely started somewhere around the 1920s in africa. In case you forgot that's after the Russian empire left, and thus your HIV stat cope doesn't work. Generations would already have been raped without being able to be infected by HIV.
Pick one, either you're a liar pushing lies and wildly exaggerated and dishonest takes, or several generations of your ancestors were raped by the russians, some even going to fight for the russians afterwards. Which one will you choose? Will you pick the wildcard option and claim you actually won when Russia occupied your lands? But then why is your country so butthurt at soviet and imperial russian occupation? It doesn't add up.
If russians rape men weaker than them and those they want to punish, your forefathers that failed their uprising, that had funding from abroad by the way, would naturally be raped. They failed despite everything, making them weaker and an uprising would be something the russians would want to punish. Also, as stated by wikipedia, a source you love to use, the first cases of HIV likely started somewhere around the 1920s in africa. In case you forgot that's after the Russian empire left, and thus your HIV stat cope doesn't work. Generations would already have been raped without being able to be infected by HIV.
Pick one, either you're a liar pushing lies and wildly exaggerated and dishonest takes, or several generations of your ancestors were raped by the russians, some even going to fight for the russians afterwards. Which one will you choose? Will you pick the wildcard option and claim you actually won when Russia occupied your lands? But then why is your country so butthurt at soviet and imperial russian occupation? It doesn't add up.
7/26/2025, 1:17:42 PM
Alright, I got my answer. The pole thus admits to it being a proven fact that Russians rape weaker men and those they want to punish. The proof is right here. Lets take a look at Polish history then, shall we?
>Poland was directly under the rule of the Russian empire between 1864 and 1915, around 50 years, following them DEFEATING THE POLISH UPRISING.
>Poland was first partitioned and parts of it taken under Russian control in 1772, making the total time of control about 142 years.
>This is leaving out several defeats Poland suffered at the hands of Russia and the Warsaw pact.
>One generation is broadly defined as 25 years.
To summarize, the Polish patriot has spent hours, uncountable pbtid, and who knows how much sweat pushing the narrative, no, the truth. Remember, he hates liars. The truth that over 5 generations of his ancestors were raped by the Russians, although people like Rokossovsky willingly fighting for Russia and the Soviet Union might imply that he believes these weren't rapes at all. It's incontrovertible after all, Russians raping weaker men and those they want to punish isn't a matter of faith after all as our Polish nationalist will tell you. Who would be weaker than the men they conquered? Weird to take pride in such a shameful history, even fighting for the people that raped you, but hey, props to him for coming clean.
>Poland was directly under the rule of the Russian empire between 1864 and 1915, around 50 years, following them DEFEATING THE POLISH UPRISING.
>Poland was first partitioned and parts of it taken under Russian control in 1772, making the total time of control about 142 years.
>This is leaving out several defeats Poland suffered at the hands of Russia and the Warsaw pact.
>One generation is broadly defined as 25 years.
To summarize, the Polish patriot has spent hours, uncountable pbtid, and who knows how much sweat pushing the narrative, no, the truth. Remember, he hates liars. The truth that over 5 generations of his ancestors were raped by the Russians, although people like Rokossovsky willingly fighting for Russia and the Soviet Union might imply that he believes these weren't rapes at all. It's incontrovertible after all, Russians raping weaker men and those they want to punish isn't a matter of faith after all as our Polish nationalist will tell you. Who would be weaker than the men they conquered? Weird to take pride in such a shameful history, even fighting for the people that raped you, but hey, props to him for coming clean.
Page 1