>>533605148
Female domination implies that the female is in charge of the domination. Its a sentient person before the concept of control. You put a no infront of it and you are denying that the female is the one who loses dominance because the female part becomes emphisized. Hence no female domination events.

Female dominated implies that the female is the leader. Its a sentient person before the already admission of the subjects control status. You put a no infront of it and it becomes a denial towards females ever being in control. Hence no female dominated events.

But look greg I havent gone to school in 20 years. To make it simpler though that entire damn sentence should probably be changed to say theres no reversals of power or something