Search Results
6/13/2025, 5:35:46 PM
>>211690247
Are you capable of reading?
>State power is a reality. You can despise reality all you want like any nihilist but that won't make it go away.
Irrelevant, we are arguing theory of economics, you sperging out about state power was irrelevant to your attempt to discredit austrian economic principles, since those principles do concede that state interference changes the situation.
>I never denied that the quantity of what is produced effecting it's price in a market.
I never said that you denied it
I pointed out that it's a very base observation on something we both agree on so you using it as an "own" is ridicolous. Arguing against a strawman basically.
>This discussion is about what determines the price of labour that is being bought
So self employiment is a valid way to test your theory. You want to avoid it at all costs because your worldview crumbles.
>You argue like a Jew.
Bodied that freak (me)
>Majority of what I said has nothing to do with Marx
Yes. I accused you of being unable to argue without Marx. So yes, I wasn't accusing you of talking about marx, THE OPPOSITE.
Either you are unable to read, or dishonest. In both cases, it would be a waste of time to refute your point about monopolies, which is the only actual point in the whole post that is at least an argument (although a mediocre one)
But it's more complex than you are worth effort (the value of my shitposting labour is subjective) so I will go back to posting trannies
Are you capable of reading?
>State power is a reality. You can despise reality all you want like any nihilist but that won't make it go away.
Irrelevant, we are arguing theory of economics, you sperging out about state power was irrelevant to your attempt to discredit austrian economic principles, since those principles do concede that state interference changes the situation.
>I never denied that the quantity of what is produced effecting it's price in a market.
I never said that you denied it
I pointed out that it's a very base observation on something we both agree on so you using it as an "own" is ridicolous. Arguing against a strawman basically.
>This discussion is about what determines the price of labour that is being bought
So self employiment is a valid way to test your theory. You want to avoid it at all costs because your worldview crumbles.
>You argue like a Jew.
Bodied that freak (me)
>Majority of what I said has nothing to do with Marx
Yes. I accused you of being unable to argue without Marx. So yes, I wasn't accusing you of talking about marx, THE OPPOSITE.
Either you are unable to read, or dishonest. In both cases, it would be a waste of time to refute your point about monopolies, which is the only actual point in the whole post that is at least an argument (although a mediocre one)
But it's more complex than you are worth effort (the value of my shitposting labour is subjective) so I will go back to posting trannies
Page 1