>>81504300
a willingness to give your everything and desire to share you life with someone

i kinda hate that definition but i do agree with it
i guess my own definition doesn't invalidate transactional "love"; although, i would assert that the "desire to share you life with someone" has to be independent of what they can provide
maybe that's my amended definition
>a willingness to give your everything and desire to share you life with someone, regardless of your conditions
since that precludes "love" where the partner really loves money as they would cease to "love" their partner if the money dried up
love should be immutable even if the relationship can't be