>>63990481
>>63990386
Here's a figure from the study you're misquoting (without knowing you're even trying to quote it). This was the level of marksmanship that their soldiers had when they asked them "How often in each of these range bands did you fire your rifle in combat with the expectation that you'd be able to hit something other than by chance?" and still came up with a figure that more than 20% of the useful shots were at more than 300 yards in most circumstances relevant to our current conversation.

People like (You) should be forced to read the studies you like to pretend to be quoting and answer some questions about them before being allowed to use the internet.