>>280089928
>You can reverse search and check the source at the time, see how nobody called them mentally ill for it and they didn't get in trouble for it.
Which doesn't mean the deemed as something entirely "straight"
>No you don't. Just because there are videos where it doesn't appear doesn't means it was abnormal or uncommon.
"Rules for thee, but not for me" , but yet i have to trust in your "sources". holy double standard.