Search Results
7/15/2025, 11:34:14 PM
>>510482245
the chinks own them all so maybe they could help, especially with the transport in a hands off approach, would get around various meme laws
grok has given me the below, but its being a bit fucking soft saying I shouldnt do it and it breaches maritime laws
>Dry bulk carrier vessels are designed to transport cargo like grain, coal, or ore in large holds, not to carry passengers in chambers. They lack accommodations or life support systems for large numbers of people. However, if you're referring to hypothetically placing people in the cargo holds (chambers), the number depends on the vessel's cargo capacity and the space required per person.
>Assuming a person requires about 2 cubic meters of space (standing room, minimal comfort, like in a crowded scenario), you could theoretically fit 5,000 to 40,000 people in the holds of an average dry bulk carrier.
>Such use would violate maritime safety regulations (e.g., SOLAS).
the chinks own them all so maybe they could help, especially with the transport in a hands off approach, would get around various meme laws
grok has given me the below, but its being a bit fucking soft saying I shouldnt do it and it breaches maritime laws
>Dry bulk carrier vessels are designed to transport cargo like grain, coal, or ore in large holds, not to carry passengers in chambers. They lack accommodations or life support systems for large numbers of people. However, if you're referring to hypothetically placing people in the cargo holds (chambers), the number depends on the vessel's cargo capacity and the space required per person.
>Assuming a person requires about 2 cubic meters of space (standing room, minimal comfort, like in a crowded scenario), you could theoretically fit 5,000 to 40,000 people in the holds of an average dry bulk carrier.
>Such use would violate maritime safety regulations (e.g., SOLAS).
Page 1