I can't follow what these two spastics are arguing over when it comes to Serco. It's a misunderstanding on all sides. They'll rent the houses out, the houses will deteriorate but they won't care because the nigs won't leave and when they do they'll go to other nigs that don't know any better. 'Condemned' buildings due to damage they'll cause is farcical. It'll be a nightmare for Serco wages but wages and management aren't the ones reaping the profits directly are they? Serco shareholders aren't the ones going door to door and if one manager quits, some other wagey will take their place to herd the nigs they've got in their pens. Slums are the destination, once the condition can't be brought up to standard and that 'new standard' replaces it in a downwards spiral. They'll be no courts, no hit pieces, nothing will be exposed. Another Grenfell? Who'll care, it'll be swept under because the money machine must continue uninterrupted and the Government will not want to lose its pens.
Your failing is failing to understand that they don't care about the conditions.