Search Results
6/27/2025, 2:14:18 AM
>>95960275
>>95960299
Thanks for the kind words. And to answer "some anon's" rather disingenuous question >>95960331
even though "some anon" has still not put on a trip to distinguish himself for the sake of argument; it's long winded so sorry in advance, feel free to skip it.
Personally, I don't see it as Avatarfagging. To post a relevant or even unrelated post to a picture is not avatarfagging. Literally anyone can post "as" Kobby. I myself have proved that I can pretty much replicate any recognizable OC. so "some anon" could be getting mad at someone else other than the creator of a character even though the creator didn't post the character. We are all (barring lowercase) anonymous. We all have access to the same tools & prompts, we have all shared these prompts too, we also post other pics beyond the recognizable ones. So in the end, I think it's retarded to call this avatarfagging. If I post a 40k TTS meme as a response to someone, that is not avatarfagging. Just because a picture is relevant to the words an anon typed, it doesn't immediately become avatarfagging either, I may have text "speaking as" a character or quoting a character, either preexisting like Gandalf or something I've made myself. But that's not avatarfagging. If someone posts a reply to someone saying "And my axe!" with a picture of Gimli, it doesn't mean that the anon is claiming to be Gimli. It's just pictures. No one is using it as "clout" or whatever. We're all still anons.
>>95960299
Thanks for the kind words. And to answer "some anon's" rather disingenuous question >>95960331
even though "some anon" has still not put on a trip to distinguish himself for the sake of argument; it's long winded so sorry in advance, feel free to skip it.
Personally, I don't see it as Avatarfagging. To post a relevant or even unrelated post to a picture is not avatarfagging. Literally anyone can post "as" Kobby. I myself have proved that I can pretty much replicate any recognizable OC. so "some anon" could be getting mad at someone else other than the creator of a character even though the creator didn't post the character. We are all (barring lowercase) anonymous. We all have access to the same tools & prompts, we have all shared these prompts too, we also post other pics beyond the recognizable ones. So in the end, I think it's retarded to call this avatarfagging. If I post a 40k TTS meme as a response to someone, that is not avatarfagging. Just because a picture is relevant to the words an anon typed, it doesn't immediately become avatarfagging either, I may have text "speaking as" a character or quoting a character, either preexisting like Gandalf or something I've made myself. But that's not avatarfagging. If someone posts a reply to someone saying "And my axe!" with a picture of Gimli, it doesn't mean that the anon is claiming to be Gimli. It's just pictures. No one is using it as "clout" or whatever. We're all still anons.
Page 1