>>717208884
>Read the OP
reread the OP. now look at his image. do you imagine this is what he's looking for? it's as "beastly" as some of your other examples.

>that is not a kemonomimi character.
reread the post you're replying to.

>which is very false.
[Citation Needed]. anon, have you been here long enough to see some of those memes? the ones where an anthro girl transforms into kemomimi and the observer is very upset?
yeah, there's a reason for all of those.
it's because kemomimi was way more popular than full anthro.

>Just look at Zootopia
just look at Ne Zha 2 making twice that at the box office, a movie without any anthro or mimi characters at all.
anon, do you think the modern times and changing markets might have something to do with these movies successes?

>A girl wearing a bunny suit isn't a real animal girl!
well yes, anon. that's because animalgirls don't exist. what you're missing is that the photo i posted is 64 years old and led to massive, massive cultural impact. it shaped tastes.

> I think you are blind
you stole my line

since you pulled out the definition of snout, let's check on kemonomimi.
>They often exhibit other animalistic traits, such as paws, claws, or different eye shapes, but generally retain a humanoid form.
oops, looks like more than just ears/tail count after all!

>Woren aren't anthro.
so you're not that anon. could've fooled me.