Search Results
6/26/2025, 6:42:24 PM
>>280007263
It's something I noticed when searching for them. Official measurements are either not that common or documenting them is not worth it. I have dozen other names but I think I would have to see the works they are from to make an accurate measurement.
>>280007966
230 cm was the limit I've chosen for multiple reasons. Mostly becuse it's what I assume the limit for genetic freaks, or at least what can be classified as "normal".
Thanks for the suggs. Are those the tallest girls for each of their respective series?
>>280008073
I see. Going to correct that.
It's something I noticed when searching for them. Official measurements are either not that common or documenting them is not worth it. I have dozen other names but I think I would have to see the works they are from to make an accurate measurement.
>>280007966
230 cm was the limit I've chosen for multiple reasons. Mostly becuse it's what I assume the limit for genetic freaks, or at least what can be classified as "normal".
Thanks for the suggs. Are those the tallest girls for each of their respective series?
>>280008073
I see. Going to correct that.
Page 1