>>511075131
>Show me government structures or monuments that are christian and not deist.
sure, see pic related

>You still have yet to address the words of the judge from that case you posted.
sure,

my claim:
>did you know the supreme court upheld the decision that the united states is a "Christian Nation?" in 1892? (hyperbolic but technically true)
brewer's words in a later book:
>Christianity is not the established religion. (i agree)
>the constitution has the establishment clause (baptists like me fought for this)
>nevertheless, everyone speaks of this republic as a Christian nation, in fact as the leading Christian nation in the world. it is not a mere creation of the imagination. it is not a term of derision but has substantial basis, one which justifies its use. (rip your point)
yeah i don't think it's the gotcha you thought it was.

if we're going by unaddressed arguments and points within our exchange, there are about 10 of mine you didn't address or merely pretend didn't exist and continued to repeat your false assertion. most glaringly:
>implying 7% means all is silly
>implying freemasons are necessarily deist
>pretending "painting the USA as a christian nation" was something that happened in the 1930's