>>509680998
As to Turner, like almost all mainstream accounts of Hitler's rise, it makes very little sense
His main argument is also mostly a strawman, as hardly anyone has argued with any force that 'German industrialists' were behind Hitler and the NSDAP. For the part that isn't a strawman, it's plain wrong, as Thyssen and Stinnes were extremely wealthy and influential industrialists who did indeed fund and support the NSDAP, as did e.g. (Rothschild agent) Deterding and Shell, and of course Ig Farben did too, but Turner notes they supported others too and thinks that's some kind of refutation
Don't ever use that book again to argue anything until you've actually read and rejected it yourself, anon