>>24523733
Yockey's Imperium. At best he will say things like this which are intended to be refutations but in no way incompatible with the premise(like his conception of "Genius" intends softly to be a rebuttal to Marxism)
or like in this excerpt he'll mince words to make it seem like their actual argument is something different and what the writer actually said is the refutation(something you'd realize was Marx's point[trusts and trade unions being nothing more than counterparts] by reading the WLC/VPP pamphlets like once, for example, is treated as something he never realized at all)