Search Results
7/2/2025, 11:07:32 PM
How exactly is pedophilia "wrong"? Little boys sexually experiment with each other all the time, how is it suddenly le worst thing ever when they do it with a man instead? Lots of people had positive sexual experiences with adults as children.
>inb4 muh power imbalance muhfugga
This is retarded, this applies to all relationships between men and women, because men are superior to women. This doesn't automatically make a sexual relationship wrong.
>inb4 muh power imbalance muhfugga
This is retarded, this applies to all relationships between men and women, because men are superior to women. This doesn't automatically make a sexual relationship wrong.
6/17/2025, 10:27:27 PM
>>17771289
This thread is an epicwin though, owo. And the other element of his post is correct.
>>17771324
>Except there is, heterosexual sex can be assumed in a culture which does not die out.
This is not archeological evidence, it's an inference made with other evidence. This is not evidence on par with the type of evidence which you are requesting to prove the presence of pederasty.
>The Wikipedia on Celtic deities often has them depicted in male-female pairings in various reliefs
These are not depictions of sexual relations.
>So you are walking back a claim you made that everyone can go check
I never claimed that they had no archeological output.
>you claimed that pederasty was pervasive in pre-Christian, there is not evidence such that it is
There is abundant evidence that it was, which you ignore.
>This is partially because we lack sources from the Celts and Germans (which had cultures that spanned millennia) and so making definitive statements about certain points in time is retarded nor does it lend itself to "pervasive" pederasty
We have several Greek/Roman sources spanning centuries which comment on Celtic pederasty, which tells us that the Celts practiced pederasty, and that it was pervasive throughout a considerable span of time.
>Rome had the Lex Scantinia a law specifically designed to outlaw Pederasty
*Outlaw sex with a freeborn male minor, and the law was hardly enforced. Roman emperors after this law was enacted still had boy sex slaves and boy-lovers, such as Augustus, Tiberius, and Hadrian.
The bottom line is this: I'm right, you're wrong. Celts in mud-huts living over two-thousand years ago practicing pederasty isn't going to leave an archeological record, nobody except you in this particular argument thinks it is reasonable to expect that. All the evidence supports my argument, you are now denying facts which are so obvious, nobody in history before 21st century internet revisionists would deny them. Give up.
This thread is an epicwin though, owo. And the other element of his post is correct.
>>17771324
>Except there is, heterosexual sex can be assumed in a culture which does not die out.
This is not archeological evidence, it's an inference made with other evidence. This is not evidence on par with the type of evidence which you are requesting to prove the presence of pederasty.
>The Wikipedia on Celtic deities often has them depicted in male-female pairings in various reliefs
These are not depictions of sexual relations.
>So you are walking back a claim you made that everyone can go check
I never claimed that they had no archeological output.
>you claimed that pederasty was pervasive in pre-Christian, there is not evidence such that it is
There is abundant evidence that it was, which you ignore.
>This is partially because we lack sources from the Celts and Germans (which had cultures that spanned millennia) and so making definitive statements about certain points in time is retarded nor does it lend itself to "pervasive" pederasty
We have several Greek/Roman sources spanning centuries which comment on Celtic pederasty, which tells us that the Celts practiced pederasty, and that it was pervasive throughout a considerable span of time.
>Rome had the Lex Scantinia a law specifically designed to outlaw Pederasty
*Outlaw sex with a freeborn male minor, and the law was hardly enforced. Roman emperors after this law was enacted still had boy sex slaves and boy-lovers, such as Augustus, Tiberius, and Hadrian.
The bottom line is this: I'm right, you're wrong. Celts in mud-huts living over two-thousand years ago practicing pederasty isn't going to leave an archeological record, nobody except you in this particular argument thinks it is reasonable to expect that. All the evidence supports my argument, you are now denying facts which are so obvious, nobody in history before 21st century internet revisionists would deny them. Give up.
Page 1