>>511081829
>The commies were more absolutist. The US regime holds more of an absolute power than any absolute monarch ever held, especially outside the USA.
That is to the disgrace of those absolute monarchies (i.e. that Communist states have outperformed them in being received like prophets while people don't hold their royalty in pre-eminence).
Should we fault North Korea for being a hereditary State and successfully achieving those corporatist ideals as it was intended while royalty today fail to live up to it?
The ideal is that they should be absolute and by being absolute override the divisions of the estates and attain greater unity.