Search Results
7/18/2025, 8:34:34 AM
>>63997723
That's what every test subject said, but they still did better with bullpups than they thought. Many such cases!
>>63997860
>if none of your riflemen can hit at 300 yards anyway, then why issue powerful rifles?
Couldn't say it better myself.
>>63998014
>Yeah, and it's a lie on multiple counts.
No u. I like how you hyperficate on POISON BULLETS but then say everything else was a lie, no questions asked. I can't tell if you're baiting or retarded but who'd wanna write text walls for bait?
>Yeah lol: In WWII, with no optics at all and soldiers who couldn't shoot straight
Are you blaming the tool or the user? Both? Nothing will satisfy you. I think they will still shoot like shit even with modern guns and gear and training. Did you know that in Vietnam the majority of lethal small arms engagements were under 300 yards? The very conflict that saw battle rifles get shitcanned in the first place? Way to fight the last war, like the dumbasses behind the M7.
>They did fine when it wasn't McNamara's morons using them
You seem to be a holdout then. How many soldiers with m16s abandoned it for m14s? Those early adopters of m16s would now have more reason to keep them once AKs were introduced.
>Are they even in service anymore?
Of course, in the rest of the military, forget the rest of the world. Stoner won, keep seething.
That's what every test subject said, but they still did better with bullpups than they thought. Many such cases!
>>63997860
>if none of your riflemen can hit at 300 yards anyway, then why issue powerful rifles?
Couldn't say it better myself.
>>63998014
>Yeah, and it's a lie on multiple counts.
No u. I like how you hyperficate on POISON BULLETS but then say everything else was a lie, no questions asked. I can't tell if you're baiting or retarded but who'd wanna write text walls for bait?
>Yeah lol: In WWII, with no optics at all and soldiers who couldn't shoot straight
Are you blaming the tool or the user? Both? Nothing will satisfy you. I think they will still shoot like shit even with modern guns and gear and training. Did you know that in Vietnam the majority of lethal small arms engagements were under 300 yards? The very conflict that saw battle rifles get shitcanned in the first place? Way to fight the last war, like the dumbasses behind the M7.
>They did fine when it wasn't McNamara's morons using them
You seem to be a holdout then. How many soldiers with m16s abandoned it for m14s? Those early adopters of m16s would now have more reason to keep them once AKs were introduced.
>Are they even in service anymore?
Of course, in the rest of the military, forget the rest of the world. Stoner won, keep seething.
7/11/2025, 8:35:48 PM
>>63956268
>I
>HATE
>SIGGERS
Understandable, what a waste of taxes via military/police contracts plus avoidable medical costs. Their bankruptcy can't come soon enough.
Someone should dumpster dive for all the P320's and and XM7's with worn out barrels and make a second /k/ube.
>I
>HATE
>SIGGERS
Understandable, what a waste of taxes via military/police contracts plus avoidable medical costs. Their bankruptcy can't come soon enough.
Someone should dumpster dive for all the P320's and and XM7's with worn out barrels and make a second /k/ube.
Page 1