>>511100422
whole lot of garbage to unpack here.

your claim that metaphysical facts are universally accessible through reason oversimplifies philosophy. debates like platonism vs nominalism or determinism vs free will show that metaphysical "facts" remain contested.
if metaphysical truths were as objective as you suggest, philosophers would've converged on them centuries ago. Christianity's truth doesn't hinge on being a universal deduction but on a historical revelation, which carries universal significance.
you argue Christianity's jewish roots and historical claims tie it to a specific place, unlike metaphysical facts replicable across galaxies, but this assumes metaphysical truths can't manifest in historical events.
the resurrection, a historical claim, is rooted in human history, not just jewish culture.
if it's true, it reveals a universal truth, God's power over death, applicable to any sentient being facing mortality.
its spread across cultures prove its universal relevance, not cultural theft.
the resurrection isn't a "fable" but a historical anchor for a metaphysics of redemption, which addresses universal questions of purpose and eternity.
your extraterrestrial analogy assumes alien civilizations couldn't encounter a similar revelation. if God exists, he could reveal himself in their history, just as He did in ours.
the resurrection's specificity doesn't negate its metaphysical weight, it grounds it in verifiable history, distinguishing Christianity from purely speculative systems.