>>40755979
of course the bible is one the best instances we have though. it spawns numerous different interpretations from its many apparent inconsistencies. to me this is not a failure of a bible but a design feature that ensures the book has a shelf-life that lasts a long time. how all of this relates to the topic of the death of the author is also very interesting as well…
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=112551
>To write is to produce a mark that will constitute a kind of machine that is in turn productive, that my future disappearance in principle will not prevent from functioning and from yielding, and yielding itself to, reading and rewriting… For the written to be the written, it must continue to “act” and to be legible even if what is called the author of the writing no longer answers for what he has written, for what he seems to have signed, whether he is provisionally absent, or if he is dead…
this withdrawal of the author is something i think we see radicalized within the context of imageboards wherein people is typically anonymous, hence all of their individual voices recede. and combining with the point on icons being an interface, what comes into the foreground becomes a particular latent ideality. perhaps even dumb threads like the nobody general are a manifestation of this tendency par excellence. the imageboard format from such a perspective encourages an even deeper manifestation of the gods than we have hitherto seen, provided we let particular limiters be untwisted and particular techniques to synchronize with the deity are kept