>>81804729
>You guys like to attack "birth rates" but then in an earlier post you discount economical factors. Wealthy couples making over 500k have more babies on average than couples making less than 500k. Just saw that stat somewhere.

Poverty is certainly a factor, sure. But it's not the only one, otherwise poor countries (like Somalia) wouldn't have babies at all. Unless of course, there was another factor involved, which brings us to...

>Go on post your "birth rates" graph that shows how birth rates are higher in countries with less womens rights
They're also the countries where feminism didn't propagandize their women.
Maybe it's not just "women's rights", maybe it's this very specific political ideology that affects birth rates.
Prove to me that is specifically the lack of women's rights, and not the lack of feminism, that affects birth rates.
I jest of course, I know in your dumb head you think those are one and the same.