Search Results
7/1/2025, 8:32:42 PM
>>28490898
>My problem is that we can't settle in an objective way though violence.
Victory has many fathers, while defeat is an orphan. When washington was strong in the 20th century, washington cultural imperalism capitvated the world. When washington is weak in the 21st century, all things associated with it become repulsive. So it goes.
>See?
Here's the thing: true enough words can mean different things to different people, and true enough a meeting of the minds in good faith would involve laying out your own senses of word and finding bridges of understanding too. Well at least I've explained myself at greater length. You've done nothing except fling poop the whole time.
People like you are getting replaced by chatgpt because you are both alike; nothing real going on inside, just stochastic word generation.
As for the rest, it's funny how you can't seem to decide if you want me to be an academic toady or to have never read anything at all. Goes to show how you're just not built to handle anything that goes off the script. Though thinking that you can't read anything without having any thoughts about what you're reading would also be on brand for your kind.
It's a simple point that is true in of itself. You can expand on the issue because you can expand any issue; this is another statement that is both true and also a trivial truth unresponsive to the point. If you want a conversation about the 'greater nuances' feel free to offer your understanding of them and we can get started. (For the record I don't think you have anything and this is all just performative theater.)
>My problem is that we can't settle in an objective way though violence.
Victory has many fathers, while defeat is an orphan. When washington was strong in the 20th century, washington cultural imperalism capitvated the world. When washington is weak in the 21st century, all things associated with it become repulsive. So it goes.
>See?
Here's the thing: true enough words can mean different things to different people, and true enough a meeting of the minds in good faith would involve laying out your own senses of word and finding bridges of understanding too. Well at least I've explained myself at greater length. You've done nothing except fling poop the whole time.
People like you are getting replaced by chatgpt because you are both alike; nothing real going on inside, just stochastic word generation.
As for the rest, it's funny how you can't seem to decide if you want me to be an academic toady or to have never read anything at all. Goes to show how you're just not built to handle anything that goes off the script. Though thinking that you can't read anything without having any thoughts about what you're reading would also be on brand for your kind.
It's a simple point that is true in of itself. You can expand on the issue because you can expand any issue; this is another statement that is both true and also a trivial truth unresponsive to the point. If you want a conversation about the 'greater nuances' feel free to offer your understanding of them and we can get started. (For the record I don't think you have anything and this is all just performative theater.)
Page 1