>>81722298
It wouldn't be a "DO NOT EMPLOYEE" list like women. But you might get a promotion or raise nefered for poor decisions made with a clear slate over time unlike ewhores who forever ewhore their bodies out.
Every private company is desperate to build a social credit system. I see this as inevitable sadly. It's just a question of if they will actually hold women accountable or will make it so whores get protection while men who said nigger outloud while reading Huckleberry Finn can never get a job again.
>>81722416
Dating apps being banned would be the biggest net positive for society.
Problem is squaring free speech with banning a dating app.
>However
The thing about modern dating apps is its not like before where you could see what was in your area and browse for yourself. They are controlling what you see and don't see. This means in theory they could be held liable for anything that happens as a result of a match as it was the dating apps responsibility to filter.
This would could lead to a wave of lawsuits cause the moment women sniff free money for playing victim they take it en mass.

Dating apps would shut down entirely or become section 230 non algorithm non gamified sites letting you see all options but with fake AI profiles running a muk making everything worse overall.

That's the only way I see the dating app crisis breaking. Women have already ruined most dating apps, and most men have checked out. Having dating apps become legally liable for everything would make them close shop.

Women be walking around with the stinky pussy like that whoa nelly type stench wow.

>Taller friend wraps his arm around my shoulder
Bruh stop im a grown ass man :(