>>63990542
>>63990536
>>63990526
>>63990481
>>63990386
Oh no, but I insist. Since you're going to losely refer to the study, tell us all why they recommended SCHV rifles and insisted they'd be adequately lethal compared to battle rifle cartridges. It wasn't just that riflemen couldn't hit shit in 1950 because they had minute-of-barn rifles, could barely see what they were shooting at, and had terrible individual marksmanship. No, it's because 220 and 223 were more effective than 30 cal rounds with the TOXIC BULLETS they were going to introduce to compensate for the lack of lethality.
>picrel, the weapons of the future-past, that you all keep defending