>>213154383
Because the term literally just means Han clothes, much like how Hanbok means Korean clothes, my brainlet friend. See picrel: what you just described is literally what happened with "Hanbok" lmao.
In the Ming dynasty, this would be the regular clothing that they wore, so no shit they wouldn't randomly attach "han" to it. It'd be like calling a pair of jeans "Americlothes" instead of just calling it "clothing". Maybe in 500 years, jeans will be called "Americlothes".
Why you so mad and projecting so much, gookie?