Search Results
ID: s7ALxMBd/pol/510318866#510327650
7/14/2025, 5:27:54 AM
>>510326934
>I think your odds are better if at least one of the partners grew up in unbroken 2 parent household so knows how that goes and can try to replicate and adapt.
Divorce is clearly and obviously genetic in nature; it either is or isn't in the familial DNA.
If you come from a "Marriage Fambly" [no known divorces anywhere in your fambly genealogy], then you're gonna committing a terrible terrible error of CATEGORY if you attempt to marry into a "Divorce Fambly".
A boy from a Marriage Fambly marrying a girl from a Divorce Fambly is arguably as bad as a girl from a Marriage Fambly indulging in outright mudsharkery.
You must never make categorical errors of that magnitude; those sorts of categorical errors will simply destroy your fambly.
There are both Categorical Errors of the highest degree, which will destroy your fambly's genealogy.
>I think your odds are better if at least one of the partners grew up in unbroken 2 parent household so knows how that goes and can try to replicate and adapt.
Divorce is clearly and obviously genetic in nature; it either is or isn't in the familial DNA.
If you come from a "Marriage Fambly" [no known divorces anywhere in your fambly genealogy], then you're gonna committing a terrible terrible error of CATEGORY if you attempt to marry into a "Divorce Fambly".
A boy from a Marriage Fambly marrying a girl from a Divorce Fambly is arguably as bad as a girl from a Marriage Fambly indulging in outright mudsharkery.
You must never make categorical errors of that magnitude; those sorts of categorical errors will simply destroy your fambly.
There are both Categorical Errors of the highest degree, which will destroy your fambly's genealogy.
Page 1