Every single woman who has ever taken a stance for "right wing" beliefs or who has shown alleged sympathy for typical male problems, is a grifter. Women are a collective and they show a great ingroup preference (sympathy for female problems), while they show zero outgroup preference, aka they have - on average, there are exceptions - zero empathy or understanding for the problems that men face. This tactic of pandering to male issues is called "Bait and Switch", they do this in relationships too. Hannah Pearl Davis is another example of a successfull "tradwife" grifter. She will do this exactly as long as she can milk the simps dry off their money. If Davis took her own "anti-feminist" theses seriously and lived them, then she wouldn't comment publicly. She's making a living out of her "please pay attention to me" bullshit and provocation. Such people are not suitable for serious, objective debate and are not real anti-feminists. They do not advance any debate in the sense of metapolitics and only feed their own ego.

>>510080788
>All of your words are just noise, gibberish coming from an out-group that they can not recognize as human beings and this is not even something they decided to be, it's just what they are.
Yeah, this is one big lesson about women even /pol/ has yet to learn: women have a strong in-group preference and even men have - on average - way more empathy towards women than towards other men. Women are master manipulators, always pretending to be the victim. They're so good at this that even most men believe them most of the time.
Men absolutely have to learn the same - to be more indifferent and suspicious of female complaining, while being more empathetic to men who talk about their problems.