>>509618242
>Wrong barbarian doesn't have the same connotation as white
No, buddy, it carried the same shit. White as a term comes from the Spanish who saw the uncivilized injun tribes and made a separation. But before that it was Christendom, before Christendom it was beign Roman, etc.
>But they didn't considered Egyptians
They did. Everyone of non-Greek culture was considered a barbarian and thus uncivilized to them.
>The racial hierarchy of today wasn't a thing for them
It was. It was Hellenes above everyone else.
>But when it comes to the term white it was used as racial identification term for the first time by spaniards to distinguish themselves from moors later after anglos defeated spaniards thus the hegemony of anglos began anglos changed the meaning of the word excluding spaniards and other southerners
Sure, the meaning changed as I've said, but the origin of the word and the previous ones remain the same
>What are outliers anon
?
>You literally
I literally have light brown hair and blue eyes. But that's beside the point. Do you really think this guy is non-white because he doesn't have blonde hair? Even most nords don't have blonde hair. I also don't seek to be accepted by anyone, that's not the point, I'm simply explaining what white means history wise. Whether some nordicist thinks i'm white or not doesn't matter one bit to me.
>Were they aware you're a bulgar a foreigner
The people I talked to for a lengthy period of time, yes.
>>509619168
>I honestly don't give a shit about what happens in Ukraine or UK where are anglos are set to become a minority
Me neither. But you'd have to be retarded not to think of them as closer to you than some sand nigger or african. Look at European physionomy and that of other people. It's entirely different, hair and eye color or not
>Anon irish were not considered white for a long time
This is a common lie. They were always considered white per law. That's why they were allowed to immigrate to the US in the first place.