>>510881165
>have you maybe thought of not being a fucking pedophile? like it's that easy just don't be a pedophile and defend other pedophiles and you too can reap the benefits of not being a degenerate pedophile >how is this hard to understand?

Why do I have to obey you to code for free?
When I joined opensource 25 years ago I was told:
1) Freedom of speech is absolute
2) Only the code matters
3) Behavior doesn't matter, everyone is welcome.
4) Programmers are who matter, not community.
5) You all own your own copyrights.
6) "We" will all sue anyone who impinges on the GPL
7) Women don't code lol.
8) Speech isn't behavior.

Now I'm told I'm banned if I don't like:
1) feminists
2) pedo-hating christians
3) people who obeyed Jesus Christ's commandment in matthew 19 (greek) and chopped their dick and balls off

And I'm banned if I do like:
1) young girls
2) YHWH's law explicitly allowing child brides.
3) Hans Reiser's act of execution against his adulterous "wife" in accordance with YHWH's law and against Jesus' "no stone woman" codicil.

Why do you get to take Pedos code (ex: RMS), tell them that 1-8 are the rules and ideas, and then, after they have detrimentally relied on 20 years of your announcements regarding those ideas; then ban them and keep their code?

For free?

Why do you get to take over our opensource world?

Here's some threats and comments from the white new-testament (millstone) loving lunduke crowd, for your records:

https://youtu.be/b9JMVrdpsgI?t=1306 [Embed] wants Jeremy cancled.
https://youtu.be/b9JMVrdpsgI?t=1482 [Embed] confirms he was a but-for cause of firing the guy
The above can be used in a lawsuit if you wish, since it's an admission.
https://youtu.be/b9JMVrdpsgI?t=1585 [Embed] trying to find more witches to burn

White christians demand death for free software developer:
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/105896457/#q105909197
>Anonymous Mon 14 Jul 2025 20:33:13 No.105909197 Report
>I started reading the transcripts and had to stop. This shit is beyond >sickening. This man unironically needs to be removed from life. By his >own hand or another's it doesn't matter.

>>105909172
>100% he reads the sexual assault subs specifically so he can jack off to >stories of people getting raped as kids. This is the kind of person Debian >is willing to do anything to protect.

----------------
>White christian wants to imprison free software guy
>@PopsSinging
>59 minutes ago
>He lives in Florida, I am curious if he notified FDLE of his travel plans as >required by law. Not doing it could lead to charges. Just thinking out loud. >I would do the investigatory work, but I am down sick with COVID right now.

-----------------
>Quoted By: >>105909254
>I just can't feel safe us.. Until the FOSS community issues an apology and all his >"contributions" have been removed
> >>105909161
>this but unironically. I already have a debloated Windows ISO ready to go

--------------------
MARRY LITTLE GIRLS.
LOCO FOR LOLI == GOOD DEVELOPER

>>105923699
>How about you shove that Israeli god far up your fucking ass you autistic faggot.
No. YHWH allows child brides and is thus good for men.
You can't argue against him.
With him, Loli lovers have strength (see: muslims marrying little girls and killing white people like yourself for opposing it)

Without him: your Jesus and his millstone wins, women win, men are diminished and the race of people die out (see: white people)
>Spamming your dogshit every single thread about child brides and what not.
Genesis starts with "Bereshiet", not dogshit. White faggot.
>Genuinely off yourself.
MAKE ME dipshit.
I'll gladly kill YOU.

YHWH allows child brides.
Marry little girls.
Kill women who oppose this (like Nina Reiser was killed by Hans)

>>105833962
Notice the false dichotomy we are forced to accept:

1) "Trans-gay-feminist" Code of Conduct Linux (they hate loli lovers btw). They aren't programmers.
2) Lunduke "conservative" Linux (they hate loli lovers btw). They aren't programmers.

We are being controlled by 2 enemy camps now.
Like this dipshit that doesn't program:
>>105834683
Or this other dipshit that doesn't program:
>>105834650

And both tell us what Opensource or RMS is; when we watched and interacted with both while it was actually growing. But "we" are wrong.

RMS just "mis spoke"
"for 30 years"

>>105834683
You may change a man's mind against his will
But he will be of the same opinion still.

Asking for a friend.

The GPL is revocable.
CoC's violate the Copyright holder's exclusive right to control Derivative Works.
They are a Copyright violation against any Copyright holder that did not OK or envision a Code of Conduct attached to their Work. An additional wrighting added by a 3rd party; attached.

Darkplaces says no contributions from paedophiles.
Xonotic says no contributions from paedophiles.