>>511019010
Your using the 2012 map, try the 2025 best timeline map.

>>511019205
Yes, and no, but also it's worse than you think.

In like, the late 90s they decided to split up the northwest territories into two, the creation of Nunavut is based upon them sending a single Inuit to Ottawa to "learn about how the qualunats think" and within a week he made them commit to creating a Inuit only ethnostate, that explicitly states everyone but them has to ask for permission to have any sort of recreational activities.
Also it's a land compromised of 99.5% rocks, seriously everything is made out of rocks there.

Alberta has wheat, cows, coal, the third largest proven reserves.
Yukon has gold, and Yukon Gold potatoes, and that's about it.
N.BC has weed, oil and gas, and then a nice mountain to keep the dope smoking hippies away from us.
Saskatchewan has wheat, potash and Uranium, thusly security food and energy security domestically, and then in hands that don't deliberately mis manage it and do things like milk dumping or running dairy cartels or wheat pools, could solve world hunger twice over.
>Or not.

The Manitoba question in itself can be answered by asking "what is a Winnipeg handshake?"