>>509022795
>Obviously not. Apparently your vocabulary is severly limited.
You're going to double down on this stupid larp of yours, eh? Like I said, no Norwegian would ever speak the way you do.

>Du har vel ikke engang sett på en frue.
This is a grammatically correct translation of
>You haven't even looked at a lady
or something like that.

But no Norwegian would ever say that. We neither have the idiomatic expression of "looked at" in the context you're trying to convey, and not a single person uses the archaic word "frue" which basically in colloquial use today means "wife" in a tongue-in-cheek way.

So here's what you sound like to me, if the situation was reversed and I was trying to say what you plotted into your translation tool in English:
>you have not even observed a madam

It's just a meaningless phrase that has none of the context you tried to convey, grammatically correct, tho, something jewgle translate would shit out.

So I know for a fact you are not Norwegian, and I also know you're a woman, from your irrational and emotional seetheposts about how everything in your life is men's fault.