Search Results
ID: I8yZKh3L/pol/507688182#507688535
6/17/2025, 6:53:51 AM
SCOTUS yet-to-be decided as of June 15, 2025:
US v Skrmetti: Whether 14A prohibits restrictions on child sexual mutilation
Hewitt v US: First Step Act applicability to an edge case
Stanley v Sanford FL: Applicability of disability
FSC v Paxton: Whether Texas can ban censorship
McLaughlin v McKesson: Relationship between judicial procedure and other laws
FDA v Reynolds Vapor: Judicial venue
Gutierrez v Saenz: Whether the Constitution requires DNA evidence for capital cases
Esteras v US: Immigration law
Perttu v Richards: PLRA right to jury trial
NRC v TX: Dispute about nuclear waste
LA v Callais: Potential error of district court
Riley v Bondi: Immigration deadlines
EPA v Calumet Shreveport: EPA venue
OK v EPA: EPA venue
Fuld v PLO: Due process clause and FSIA exemption for foreign terrorism
Medina v PP: Whether Planned Parenthood has a right to federal money under federal entitlement law
Kennedy v Braidwood: Potential 5C error
Mahmoud v Taylor: Woke education mandates
Diamond Alt Energy v EPA: Effects of regs on third parties
US v Skrmetti: Whether 14A prohibits restrictions on child sexual mutilation
Hewitt v US: First Step Act applicability to an edge case
Stanley v Sanford FL: Applicability of disability
FSC v Paxton: Whether Texas can ban censorship
McLaughlin v McKesson: Relationship between judicial procedure and other laws
FDA v Reynolds Vapor: Judicial venue
Gutierrez v Saenz: Whether the Constitution requires DNA evidence for capital cases
Esteras v US: Immigration law
Perttu v Richards: PLRA right to jury trial
NRC v TX: Dispute about nuclear waste
LA v Callais: Potential error of district court
Riley v Bondi: Immigration deadlines
EPA v Calumet Shreveport: EPA venue
OK v EPA: EPA venue
Fuld v PLO: Due process clause and FSIA exemption for foreign terrorism
Medina v PP: Whether Planned Parenthood has a right to federal money under federal entitlement law
Kennedy v Braidwood: Potential 5C error
Mahmoud v Taylor: Woke education mandates
Diamond Alt Energy v EPA: Effects of regs on third parties
6/16/2025, 11:37:51 PM
>>507638537
>>507638982
>>507639359
Update: I might need to look into it more but I'm guessing the reason there was an explicit ban on discriminating against veterans for political reasons in the VA Health system is that it's about mental health. The article explicitly discusses psychiatrists as one of the categories of doctors expected to be affected. I think in the past, a load of veterans with TDS wanted pills to help treat their condition, when really they need therapy, so doctors got in hot water for saying they need therapy and not pills to treat their TDS. Considering TDS is a political medical condition, you'd expect this to be one of the most politically contentious when the govt gets involved with medicine like this. So the idea of letting doctors treat patients as they please without any fear of higher-ups getting involved and claiming they're engaging in discriminatory medical practice while treating politically-involved medical conditions like Trump derangement syndrome is likely the cause. There's also some mental conditions that are related to marriage, too, I think. So we're probably looking at some common-sense conservatism, not even a brazen act of power playing against single Democrat men for Kamala.
>>507638982
>>507639359
Update: I might need to look into it more but I'm guessing the reason there was an explicit ban on discriminating against veterans for political reasons in the VA Health system is that it's about mental health. The article explicitly discusses psychiatrists as one of the categories of doctors expected to be affected. I think in the past, a load of veterans with TDS wanted pills to help treat their condition, when really they need therapy, so doctors got in hot water for saying they need therapy and not pills to treat their TDS. Considering TDS is a political medical condition, you'd expect this to be one of the most politically contentious when the govt gets involved with medicine like this. So the idea of letting doctors treat patients as they please without any fear of higher-ups getting involved and claiming they're engaging in discriminatory medical practice while treating politically-involved medical conditions like Trump derangement syndrome is likely the cause. There's also some mental conditions that are related to marriage, too, I think. So we're probably looking at some common-sense conservatism, not even a brazen act of power playing against single Democrat men for Kamala.
Page 1