>>8865646
I totally agree on those points man. But beyond those fundamental characteristics, this is still just a retarded fetish. Not unethical, but just retarded. To highlight my point, just look at the dirty talk between "normal" fetishes and diaper dirty talk
>(bondage) ohh fuck me, fuck make me yours etc
>(DDLG) daddy i'm gonna cum! ohh god fuck me daddy blah blah blah
>(latex/gimp suits) Mmph! Huddah huddah huh [insert more TF2 Pyro noises here]

>ohhh fuck, i'm gonna wet my diaper ohhhhh i can't hold it in anymore!
>mmmmphh i think i'm gonna poop oooooooouuughhh
>ohh look at you, little baby, someone needs his diapee changed
Even the weirder of the "normal" fetishes are things you could get outed for and have it not be too weird. Only DDLG is liable to get you called a pedophile, and even then it's just vanilla sex with specialized dirty talk. All of them involve relatively normal sex, but diapers are just retarded. Diaper dirty talk sounds retarded, diaper "sex" looks retarded, and the fetish itself isn't even intrinsically sexual- you have to MAKE diapers sexual for the fetish to be recognizably sexual.