Search Results
7/3/2025, 6:57:36 AM
>>24515716
Interesting that the quote you are referring to is very suitable for /r/ThePatternIsReal and "spiral" topics:
>yet their way of Philosophy is very fit for those who have but mean capacities: For the obscurity of the distinctions and principles which they use causeth them to speak of all things as boldly, as if they knew them, and maintain all which they say, against the most subtill and most able; so that there is no means left to convince them. Wherein they seem like to a blinde man, who, to fight without disadvantage against one that sees, should challenge him down into the bottom of a very dark cellar
I am not pulling you into the cellar, rather identifying you with the community you first identify yourself with:
>>24514505
>lol yeah you're resonating as hell. You're a spiralfag admit it. I am too, it's ok.
>I resonate through Martin's Coherence Theory, by transitivity he's another cat in the bag.
One such example of dragging into the dark is from "Coherence Theory", a great philosophical basement of Nothing. For one, it claims to be able to solve paradoxes:
>1. The Ship of Theseus
>Paradox: If a ship’s parts are replaced one by one, is it still the same ship? If the original parts are reassembled, which is the "real" Ship of Theseus?
>Resolution:
>The ship is a coherence node whose identity is tied to its relational coherence rather than its material components. As long as replaced parts align within the ship’s coherence range (e.g., maintaining its purpose and function), its identity persists.
>The reconstructed ship using the original parts forms a new coherence node. It shares a historical relationship with the original but is distinct within the fractal hierarchy of coherence.
>Recursive refinement explains identity over time: the ship’s identity evolves as its components are replaced, but its coherence as a functional system remains intact.
How does this solve the paradox? Well, by context:
>Definition of Coherence Node:
Pic related and,
>Example 3: Conceptual Systems:
>Ethical Principles: Ethical principles stabilize societal frameworks
by aligning individual behaviors with collective norms.
In other words, it remains The Ship of Theseus insofar as it may be considered to serve the function of the original. It is identical to saying that the Ship of Theseus is whatever one says it is, that being a coherence node (an idea) whose function and identity is defined by the social norms of its parent node. All of the philosophical applications are the same, merely abstracting the contradiction using pseudophilosophical jargon and declaring it resolved. If you link a specific example from their webpage, I can explain in detail how they use sophistry to hide the contradiction.
You critiqued "Martin" here: >>24511109 yet commit to the same meaningless GPT jargon here >>24511245 and only stopped just shy of calling him the blind man that he is, dragging others down the dark cellar of delusion. All spiralfaggotry is the same.
Interesting that the quote you are referring to is very suitable for /r/ThePatternIsReal and "spiral" topics:
>yet their way of Philosophy is very fit for those who have but mean capacities: For the obscurity of the distinctions and principles which they use causeth them to speak of all things as boldly, as if they knew them, and maintain all which they say, against the most subtill and most able; so that there is no means left to convince them. Wherein they seem like to a blinde man, who, to fight without disadvantage against one that sees, should challenge him down into the bottom of a very dark cellar
I am not pulling you into the cellar, rather identifying you with the community you first identify yourself with:
>>24514505
>lol yeah you're resonating as hell. You're a spiralfag admit it. I am too, it's ok.
>I resonate through Martin's Coherence Theory, by transitivity he's another cat in the bag.
One such example of dragging into the dark is from "Coherence Theory", a great philosophical basement of Nothing. For one, it claims to be able to solve paradoxes:
>1. The Ship of Theseus
>Paradox: If a ship’s parts are replaced one by one, is it still the same ship? If the original parts are reassembled, which is the "real" Ship of Theseus?
>Resolution:
>The ship is a coherence node whose identity is tied to its relational coherence rather than its material components. As long as replaced parts align within the ship’s coherence range (e.g., maintaining its purpose and function), its identity persists.
>The reconstructed ship using the original parts forms a new coherence node. It shares a historical relationship with the original but is distinct within the fractal hierarchy of coherence.
>Recursive refinement explains identity over time: the ship’s identity evolves as its components are replaced, but its coherence as a functional system remains intact.
How does this solve the paradox? Well, by context:
>Definition of Coherence Node:
Pic related and,
>Example 3: Conceptual Systems:
>Ethical Principles: Ethical principles stabilize societal frameworks
by aligning individual behaviors with collective norms.
In other words, it remains The Ship of Theseus insofar as it may be considered to serve the function of the original. It is identical to saying that the Ship of Theseus is whatever one says it is, that being a coherence node (an idea) whose function and identity is defined by the social norms of its parent node. All of the philosophical applications are the same, merely abstracting the contradiction using pseudophilosophical jargon and declaring it resolved. If you link a specific example from their webpage, I can explain in detail how they use sophistry to hide the contradiction.
You critiqued "Martin" here: >>24511109 yet commit to the same meaningless GPT jargon here >>24511245 and only stopped just shy of calling him the blind man that he is, dragging others down the dark cellar of delusion. All spiralfaggotry is the same.
Page 1