>>60744147
>go do your homework kid, I'm sure you can easily figure it out yourself. google is just a click away.
Like I said, you can't give me a single example.
>more centralized by PoS
GPU mining was extremely accessible and I agree the cost or a PoS validator is higher than a GPU. But it's still more accessible than economies of scale optimized ASIC mining (requires 7+ figures and access to own power plant or industrial electricity).
>fuck them over like that
They were expendable and they knew it. A shopping mall Santa doesn't cry he lost his job when January comes.
>why would they fuck themselves like that
Only reason I can think of is to keep the chain alive. Theoretically it is a possibility, proving the 21M cap is not so real people think it is. Even BlackRock knows this. Picrel is their ETF fine print.
>they arent that smart and they wont do it because they need it to dump on you.
Again a theoretical scenario. Also there is the exact same amount to dump if there was a cap or not. What matters is how much actual inflation there is. For now, Bitcoin miners dump more on Bitcoiners than whatever Ethereum issuance is.
>now thats some crappy fanfiction and pathetic attempt at making an argument.
Bitcoin chain security issues will become reality as block reward keeps dropping. Bitcoin inflation is income for miners who keep the chain secure and cutting that has a cost.
>this is why you will stay poor.
This is why Bitcoin will suffer a 51% attack and pull me into 8 figures when I short it. Unless most value has already left that fork of Bitcoin (very likely).
>the ethereum foundation made many such bad design choices.
Agree to disagree. I value chain security more than you it seems. Maybe you don't understand Bitcoin economics well enough to see the direction it's heading and what the consequences will be.