>>105693731
you can simulate a turing machine in C
it is turing complete
its not even an argument, none are needed
youre just plainly wrong

>>105613786
yes you could
you are unironically retarded
you like to rave abt your abstract ions and such
->cant manipulate actual mental abstractions
ill walk you threough
and youll see how fucking retarded that is
and how motherfucking, utterly fucking botttom of the barrel retarded you are

->how bout just generating code
->you can have an arbitrary framework around that bc your whole language is an abstraction

and if you cant understand that
im sorry
youre just too fucking retarded then
like literally
you fucking lack IQ
hard fucking compute power in your brain

>>105585001
>How do you find ideas for what to code that won't be yet another calculator?
have problem
use brogrammink to fix problem
voila

or gaymes:
>waste taime on vidya
>start modding
>think ytf am i even doing that lets build a gayme