>>937044683

Yeah, I've been thinking that reading everything in this thread.

People found things that showed them their kink, but it didn't "make it" because there are plenty of people who have seen their parents naked and don't jerk off to them, or see panties and don't try them on. No hate, I like reading the stories, but I don't believe most of these people were "made" that way because of something they observed or did when young.

I tried on my mother's make up once as a young boy, I never developed a kink for being a sissy.

>>935810768
>You literally have no idea what you're talking about. This has been public knowledge from the porn industry for fucking decades.

OK, so explain to me seeing as it's common knowledge.

How did they make money off 11-17 year olds back in the day of VHS and DVD tapes?

You can't explain, because it's a nonsense theory.

They wanted to money, 11-17 year olds did not make them money, so why would they target them?

They can't but subscriptions, they can't buy tapes or DVDs.

So please tells me, why would they target 11-17 year olds, despite it making them lose money?

>Nobody knows the average age of porn consumption then or today.

I see, you deny studies.